A friend of mine the other day was sitting in on a college lecture. The professor was discussing race relations and was proceeding to take an incredibly sociological interpretation of historical precedents, committing to the same multiculturalist, globalist rhetoric that is endlessly parroted by leftists. Eventually, my friend raised his hand and asked if the professor had a solution to racism, to which the professor replied, “We should all have sex with each other until we’re the same color.”

This, of course, is simply a rather subtle way of saying, “I hate the fact that various races exist,” effectively admitting to hating every race in the world.

This, of course, is not an unpopular conviction held by many heroes of Social Justice Warriors (SJWs). Bill Nye, host of the children’s show Bill Nye the Science Guy, recently appeared in a Netflix premier called Bill Nye Saves the World, in which a seriously weird animation was aired:

In the above video, a vanilla ice cream cone (of course, the ice cream cone is white) is in a group discussion with other ice cream flavors. The video ends with the white vanilla cone being pressured into partaking of an interracial, intersexual orgy. The premise is similar to the statement of the professor who advocated for the abolition of race.

“C’mon, vanilla. Nobody wants just one flavor of ice cream.”

A very clearly, very robustly multiculturalist, anti-white agenda is extant in Bill Nye’s recent work, exemplifying many left-wing positions on the subjects of race and sexuality.

The point that anti-multiculturalists are attempting to get across to their liberal counterparts is not that one race is necessarily superior to another; rather, it is that diversity is best expressed when races and cultures refrain from integrating themselves into a singular “super-culture”.

Multiculturalism and the decline of European culture as the product of the radical inclusion of non-native minorities has inspired right-wing nationalists to push back against the occupation of their land by foreigners. Because of this, considered with the advent of identity politics produced by campus liberalism, the alt-right has developed a sort of reactionary identity politic that rejects the theories of reparation and historically-rooted guilt on the basis of race. This development is the conviction that the genocide of the white race is a rapidly approaching phenomenon and that the only solution is the segregation of race and culture in the name of preserving one’s own people.

The above video with the ice cream cones depicts the concern of the alt-right insofar that it is advocating the assimilation of the vanilla flavor to the multi-faceted flavors of the less-boring flavors. But, if vanilla ceases to be a flavor, and if all of the ice cream flavors were to merge together to create a singular flavor, such a flavor would be an abomination, not reflecting any prominent characteristics of the flavors that came before it. It would be the destruction of each flavor of ice cream, resulting in a legacy of loss.

“White genocide” is perhaps an extreme term to define the continuous pestering for Westerners to adapt their cultural norms and racial identity; yet, the demonization of native Europeans and white peoples is inexplicably present in the narratives presented by liberal thinkers like Billy Nye.

Watch Bill Nye endorse the implementation of penalties for Westerners who have “extra kids in the developed world.”

Whether the demolition of white identity and Western civilization is conspiratorial or not, the definition of genocide as prescribed by the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which is accepted by the United Nations, fits the propositions offered by those who desire to see the white race become diluted or extinct:

“Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group,” (Article 2 CPPCG).

The insistence for the white race to come to an end, for any reason, can therefore be considered genocidal. Whether the end be in order to enact a future “race of the future,” or due to unjust acts committed against minorities in the past, the theory that white peoples should lose their right to exist as a people possesses heavy genocidal overtones.

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi touched on this in his 1925 book titled Practical Idealism, in which he predicted that, “Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

This Kalergian prophecy is echoing with unmistakable insistence in the voices of multiculturalists, insisting that cesspools of races and cultures are positive products. But, as we all know, some people enjoy vanilla ice cream. Others may enjoy chocolate, mint chip, or strawberry; but, if one were to combine each flavor together, the result is predictably a colorless, tasteless blob of monstrosity. Diversity is best celebrated when cultures and race remain diversified, not when they are encouraged to intermingle and dilute.