While you don’t have to look far these days to find someone on the left making the “We are a nation of immigrants” argument. That surely would have been news to the Founding Fathers. Who despite a recent revisionist history movement to paint some of them, such as Alexander Hamilton as pro-immigration advocates. They were anything but. Let’s not take my or anyone else’s words for this though and let the Founders tell us themselves.

Image result for benjamin franklin

Benjamin Franklin In His Own Words

The number of purely White people in the world is proportionally very small. I could wish their numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, scouring our planet, by clearing America of woods, and so making this side of our globe reflect a brighter light to the eyes of inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the sight of Superior Beings, darken its people?

Why increase the sons of Africa, by planting them in America, where we have so fair an opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the complexion of my country, for such kind of partiality is natural to mankind.”

Related image

John Jay In His Own Words

Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people. A people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.

This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.”

Image result for alexander hamilton

Alexander Hamilton In His Own Words

The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias, and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education, and family.

Foreigners will generally be apt to bring with them attachments to the persons they have left behind; to the country of their nativity, and to its particular customs and manners. They will also entertain opinions on government congenial with those under which they have lived; or, if they should be led hither from a preference to ours, how extremely unlikely is it that they will bring with them that temperate love of liberty, so essential to real republicanism?

There may, as to particular individuals, and at particular times, be occasional exceptions to these remarks, yet such is the general rule. The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities. In the composition of society, the harmony of the ingredients is all-important, and whatever tends to a discordant intermixture must have an injurious tendency.

The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils, by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another. In times of great public danger there is always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone weakens the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader.”

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Also worth noting is the highly controversial by today’s standard belief by America’s 3rd and 4th Presidents that there was little to no hope for a peaceful co-existence in one nation of Black and White populations. While it’s certainly an unpleasant reality to admit, the current racially charged climate in America, which is often focused especially on worsening White/Black relations. Does make one at have to question if there were not at least some truth in the warnings delivered by the pair. A pair who oddly enough were otherwise possibly the only more Pro foreign immigration minded members of the core founders. Even leading the fight against concepts that limited immigration like the Alien and Sedition Acts.

Image result for thomas jefferson moneyThomas Jefferson In His Own Words

Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.”Image result for James MadisonJames Madison In His Own Words

To be consistent with existing and probably unalterable prejudices in the U. S. the freed blacks ought to be permanently removed beyond the region occupied by or allotted to a White population. The objections to a thorough incorporation of the two people are, with most of the Whites insuperable; and are admitted by all of them to be very powerful. If the blacks, strongly marked as they are by Physical & lasting peculiarities, be retained amid the Whites, under the degrading privation of equal rights political or social, they must be always dissatisfied with their condition as a change only from one to another species of oppression; always secretly confederated angst. The ruling & privileged class; and always uncontrolled by some of the most cogent motives to moral and respectable conduct.

The character of the free blacks, even where their legal condition is least affected by their colour, seems to put these truths beyond question. It is material also that the removal of the blacks be to a distance precluding the jealousies & hostilities to be apprehended from a neighboring people stimulated by the contempt known to be entertained for their peculiar features; to say nothing of their vindictive recollections, or the predatory propensities which their State of Society might foster. Nor is it fair, in estimating the danger of Collisions with the Whites, to charge it wholly on the side of the Blacks. There would be reciprocal antipathies doubling the danger.”

So the next time your leftist friend on Facebook reminds you that America has always been a nation of immigrants. Just remind them that the men who set up this country didn’t necessarily intend it to be quite as welcome to foreigners of all types as they might like to believe.

 

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.comIf you enjoyed this article please share and follow @Jack_Kenrick. If you want to help ensure more similar content, please consider clicking this button and supporting directly. Everything helps!

  • cynthia curran

    This is my reason for not liking libertarian business interests to hire who they want even people here illegality. To a libertarian if Juan gets passed the border wall, then Joe can hire him for construction work. Also, taxation is thief is stupid. What are you going to do make everyone pay 30 percent tariffs for all goods. I’m not against tariffs but taxation based upon tariffs means you live the crappy life of Joe Blow circa 1890 with lots of immigration, Taxation is fine if its more for national defense and less for the welfare state but folks like you defeat your caused by wanting to bring back America circa 1890. You also hurt the battle against illegal immigration by opposing e-verify and fining companies that hire illegal immigrants.